Are you sure that’s what he meant?

The Unreligious Right notes a case of religious discrimination in North Dakota:

A North Dakota man requested a personalized license plate saying “Is No God.” It was rejected, despite the fact that the state has allowed plates with religious messages such as “I love God” and “Praise God.”

…if you are going to allow “Praise God,” it seems pretty unreasonable to reject “Is No God.”

I quite agree, but…are you sure you’re interpreting that correctly? By choosing the words “is no God,” was this guy publicizing his atheism?

Or was he simply contracting a longer sentence? For example:

• “(There) is no God (besides Me.)”

Or:

• “(There) is no (other) God (but one.)”